I was asked for a post explaining radical inclusionism but I was unable to find one so I’m making one myself.
Radical inclusionism, often shortened to radinclus, is an ideology in which one is inclusive and accepting of all good faith identities. This is typically in regards to MOGAI and should not be assumed to encompass anything else, but each individual can use it to cover whatever they want.
Radical inclusion ALWAYS covers:
– M-Spec lesbians, non-binary lesbians and male lesbians, including AMAB male lesbians – M-spec vincians, non-binary vincians and female vincians, including AFAB female vincians – ALL xenogenders – ALL MOGAI genders, sexualities and microlabels Termhoarders of all kinds – PERSONAL definitions that exclude others and refrainment of forcing open definitions onto others (ex: vincian as NWLNW or lesbian as WLEW)- AMAB trans men, AFAB trans women, AMAB cis women and AFAB cis men – “It is not my job to declare the existence or validity of another person’s identity” – “Only the individual truly knows and understands the complexity of their identity enough to label it” – “Labels are for personal use and assignment only”
Radical inclusion NEVER covers:
–
Radical inclusion CAN cover:
– “Labels and identities CANNOT be problematic in and of themselves; identities only become problematic when they are used in problematic ways” – Genuine identification with troll terms such as super straight – Reclaiming exclusionist flags and identities – Transx identities such as transage, transracial, transabled, transheight, transweight etc.- Endogenic, non-traumagenic and non-disordered systems- Acceptance and understanding of personality disorders, cluster B disorders and other stigmatized disorders- Proship/Comship/Radship/Profic- Radical acceptance of ALL paraphilias- Radical acceptance of ALL otherkin, alterhuman and alterfolk experiences and identities, including kinnies, KFF, factkin, p-shifters and IRL’s/DA’s- etc.
However, not all radical inclusionists use the term radinclus for these things, and not all radical inclusionists do support these things (even going as far as creating “critical inclusionism” to make sure people don’t think they support proshippers) so it should NOT be assumed that any of these things are automatically included by all radical inclusionists.
