“RadNormal 🌈🌺

A queer label and stance of being radically normal. This label/stance was created in spite of all the radqueer — including adjacent — labels showing up in more recent times. It is the belief and willingness to stamp out any radqueers and harmful ideologies out of the queer community;alongside other communities affected by radqueers. Radically normal embraces the freedom of expression and the power to be aggressive to those who are harmful and pushing rhetoric that proves stereotypes to marginalized communities. We reclaim the word normal as a means to make being queer normalized, while pushing out harmful rhetoric — most harmful rhetoric (radqueers, pedophilia, darkshipping, etc) is not normal;they try to frame themselves as if they are.

RadNormal stances – 🌈🌺

RadNormal is against the following:

• Pedophiles, Zoophiles, Necrophiles + Harmful paraphiliac disorders
• Pro-contact harmful paraphiliac disordered individuals — being non-contact still has no excuse to indulge in harmful behavior whether it be fictional or not!
• Radqueers, Xenosatanists, TransIDS — “good-faith” TransIDS are on very thin ice and can depend on the individual encompassing the transID
• Proshippers, Darkshippers, Lolicons, Shotacons, Kodocons
• Endogenic, Willogenic and Non-trauma “systems”
• Pro-Censorship, Racism, Ableism, Queerphobia, Terfs, AI

RadNormal ideologies and beliefs:

• Being aggressive and rude to individuals listed above — they serve no place anywhere
• Call out wrongful behavior and keep doing so until proper accountability and justice is brought
• Keep children, victims and minorities safe from harmful communities whilst giving them a voice to speak out
• Accepting anyone including past members as a form of change — unless harm has been done, then they are not redeemable
• While mainly queer, bring attention to other problems that are not as mainstream — spotlight being put onto real life problems, like genocide, racism, censorship, political and ableist problems + etc
• Being anti-censorship and acknowledging the misuse of it in media for the wrong reasons
• Embrace being an “anti” and angering harmful communities in spite
• We DO care about discourse
• Educate those of dangerous communities and guide those out
• Accept Mogai+, Liom, Qai+ and contradictory labels

RadNormal flag color meanings – 🌈🌺

Black – The aggressive natural hatred for radqueers, child predators and harmful people alike
White – The acceptance, unity and love between individuals under the radically normal label and be kind to those around
Hot pink – Awarness to victims, children, minorities and marginalized groups
Light tan – To love oneself for being a proud “anti” agaisnt objectively harmful and predatory ideas and preaching their ideas
Cyan – The freedom to be freely queer and divide harmful labels and individuals from the queer community
Blue – The action and support of calling out and exposing real problems that cause harm to people and communities
Gradient – The knowledge of doing what is right to everyone and yourself and making the world a better place to rid of harmful and predatory individuals

RadNormal emoji combo meaning – 🌈🌺

Rainbow – To emphasize the queerness of being radically normal
Hibiscus – To feel glory and feel pride of being an “anti””

Coined by shelix1437 on May 17, 2026.

Archive of Post: https://web.archive.org/web/20260605190455/https://www.tumblr.com/shelix1437/816844584104656896/radnormal/replies/818454079783256064

Context: This was controversial even among anti-radqueer MOGAI spaces.

In a reblog from exradqueer-uni on May 31, 2026:

“I like most of what you’re doing and what your blog is dedicated too. But I feel like this identity and the things that go with it have some glaring issues. I want to preface this by saying I’m both an ex-radqueer and anti-radqueer, so I have pretty deep experience in that community.

I think this ideology is inevitably doing the opposite of what it wants to do, which is isolating young radqueers (and those in adjacent spaces) from fully seeking recovery. For starters, one of the listed beliefs is “being aggressive and rude to individuals listed above — they serve no place anywhere”. I absolutely agree that we shouldn’t be letting radqueers openly run around spaces to spread their ideology, but this tenet reads as endorsement to harass whoever this group labels as dangerous.

On top of this, you list “accepting anyone including past members as a form of change — unless harm has been done, then they are not redeemable”. Redemption is a complex thing and nobody can be fully forgiven of their sins, but again, people who have done shitty things are still capable of improving and moving on. And I have to point out that the victims of the radqueer community are not all innocent uwu babies under the age of 18. I did shitty things by virtue of being in this community and not speaking up about what I saw at the time.

Do you really think any child who’s remotely considering escaping that community is going to see y’alls approval of harassment tacked onto the “if you have done bad things you are a horrible person” and believe that you’re actually providing them a safe space to recover and speak out?”

radnormal/shelix1437 replies on May 31, 2026:

“I’ll answer while I still can before I get tired again, thanks for reblogging ur concerns with this, I will say right now: I DID write all the rn stuff late at night between 12-2 am, I’ll look over and put clarifications soon on the stance!

2nd para: I never said to HARASS anyone, im just neutral on it since it is BOUND to happen, unfortunately. If it’s really bad then I would try to do something to stop it. Being aggressive does not mean harassment, at least, that’s I think. It’s just putting your foot down and trying to get everyone out of this community. I don’t WANT to isolate young Radqueers, it’s just hard to get them out of the mind set since they’re just used to it. In fact, (this goes for anyone any age), im pro recovery and im pretty sure it states it in the stances somewhere of my post.

3rd para: I personally believe that once you’ve hurt someone, it stays there. That’s why I don’t think people are redeemable most of the time. HOWEVER it depends on the context I will say! Though, still, I believe that once you’ve hurt someone — you’ve become their trauma and that never leaves them because of someone’s horrible action. If you’re a minor, sure, you can learn but it’s on thin ice if it’s impacted someone or many people majorly. Adults should know better, once they’ve hurt someone at their grown fucking age, too late! Tooooo late.

4th para: I never said to harass anyone, that even goes for adult rqs I GUESS… radnormal IS supposed to be a safespace, it’s also just another space that happens to be aggressive to those who dare hurt the innocent. If that makes any sense hopefully, my English is a bit off.

however, thank you for giving your thoughts on this!!! while I am a bit busy atm, I will update the stances about misconceptions and clarifications and on the Strawpage too! Thank you!!!!!!!!! Hope this clears things up

also! Again im open to DM for discussions, I don’t exactly want to clog up my acc with reblog convos 😓”