anon: Psyop for xenosatanism 100% agreed honestly..

porblematic:

The thing that make me feel like this might be a psyop is how nearly every bullet point in the coining post that isn’t some shady anti-consent pro-CSA rhetorics falls under the following categories:

– just a term for an ideology or a movement that is popular amongst left-wing people, or a rough definition of such;

– a phrase that doesn’t mean anything definite or applies to the rest in extremely unclear ways (queer behaviors? deconstructionism? nihilism? all society-wide?).

A curious exception for that that sort of brings out the whole weirdness of it is mention of cyberpunk aesthetics. It is not unusual for ideologies to develop some associated aesthetics, nor it is unusual for some low-stakes, almost exclusively personal ideological statements to have pre-defined aesthetics, but “and we also want cities that look cyberpunk :3”? Cyberpunk looks cool, but it’s a dystopic genre at the core. With how changing the outlook of the cities is a common theme on leftblr, it looks a bit like someone looked at it and thought “better cities? gotcha, but make it edgier” without understanding that aesthetics it the least important part of the discussion.

If I am right, that’s what the deal with the entire list is: buzzwords, aesthetics with little substance behind them, with the poison pill of “hey, psst… would you like to fuck your little relatives and watch child porn without social repercussions?” inserted in the sexual liberation part. With how little care about the actual ideological integrity xenosatanism is presented, and how the adjacent people treat the discussion around it (“you’ve already been molested by your parents” which is emotionally manipulative and a great stretch), it feels like the whole thing has been constructed by people that are more used to right-wingish circles, where shock, disgust and irresponsible attempts to channel someone’s suppressed desires are far more accepted as tools of achieving goals.

porblematic:

[Tags: Not sure if I agree with the main point. I have seen those who genuinely identify as a xenosatanist.]

If thou dostn’t mind me responding to thy tags – it’s not the point of the post. I think such things are rarely constructed in a way that wouldn’t attract actual followers – hell, I myself wasn’t too put off when I first saw the carrd, and I had to ask the person who brought it up for the reasons they didn’t like it. The point is, xou typically dostn’t construct an ideology system this way if xou really believest it. The most benign explanation here is that the creators are very aesthetically driven and are quite bad at upholding own ideological integrity. The one I’m proposing is that they target such people (and there are always such people, that’s just the reality of life) to do the job of poisoning the discourse for ‘em.

that-cistrace-crook:

oh ok, thanks for responding