anon: ghhhhhg i have a question sorry if this is an annoying ask but awooqueer also includes pro contact for necrophilia and zoophilia, but also dossnt support non consensual acts, so im curious how you would go about contact for those without it being noncon?
* I wanted to add that you can identify as awooqueer and as a personally boundary for your own contact, not be pro-c for what you listed.
For necrophilia, one way it could be considered consensual is if the individual consents before death.
I cannot answer for the zoophilia portion due to me not really being pro-c for sexual relations between animals. However I have gotten the coiners answer to this.
This is the response for the coiner of awooqueer ..
“For necrophilia in most cases i dont care about consent you are not going to hurt something that isn’t alive but in the case of the person having for example a religious belief that the body does feel something then consent is needed before death.”
“For zoophilia is different but I believe that contact with anything that you can end up getting hurt is a no no”
“About consent in zoophilia I leave it free to interpretation cus many ppl have different ways of seeing when it is actual consent”
So what this would mean is, consent for someone who is already dead would not matter unless there is a specific religious belief that requires it. Since a dead body cannot be harmed like a person who is living. However, that changes with zoophilia since animals are something that can be harmed. Consent between an animal and a human can be left up for interpretation to the one identifying with the label due to the fact many people having different views on have animals might be able to consent.
This was their answer to this ask, while this doesn’t really explain in depth of to the exact reasons to how. So I’m not sure if this is helpful for you or not. I suggest you make a post asking this question or send an ask to someone who is fully pro-c towards zoophilia/g